Georgina Rodríguez's sister reproaches her for helping needy children and not her own nephews

The controversies do not stop persecuting the Argentine model Georgina Rodríguez, now it is not only about the impressive change of life that she had but also about the opinions of her sister and other relatives.

Days ago The uncles of Cristiano Ronaldo’s partner came out to show a different facet than the one she shows on her reality show. Well, they say that the businesswoman also forgot them since she went out with the famous soccer player and that they raised her.

However, now it is a sister on her father’s side who appears on television questioning Georgina’s decisions. Basically, she reproaches the model for being very supportive of children in need but that she is not with her own nephews.

You may also be interested in: A fairy tale full of light and dark: the hidden side of Georgina Rodríguez

Georgina Rodríguez is criticized by her paternal sister

Patricia Rodríguez was interviewed on the Spanish program “Sábado Deluxe” and told strong details of her relationship with Georgina.

“In truth, what I feel is pity and sadness for having had a relationship with her and suddenly she doesn’t want to know anything… overnight, since my father passed away,” she said when asked about what she feels towards her famous sister.

In addition, he took advantage of the moment to say that he does not receive any help from Georgina. Similarly, he questioned the model’s decision to show solidarity with poor children but not with her nephews.

“I am working in a restaurant and I earn 600 euros. And I do not hold her responsible, but I do have three children and I do have my problems and she is so supportive that she is with the children… Why is she not with her nephews? ”, Commented Patricia.

Georgina Rodríguez’s sister criticizes her for helping needy children and not her nephews. Photo: Saturday Deluxe

Likewise, Georgina Rodríguez’s sister said that on one occasion she did not have to pay for her children’s school and thought that Cristiano’s partner could help her, but it was not so.

“I went to school crying with an anxiety attack because I didn’t have to pay. And I called and asked her please that she did not want money, that they only go to the school that I gave them even her number so that they could get in touch, “she said. In addition, she added that “she told me, for example, that she was going to help me with my children’s school books and I’m still waiting.”

Photo: Instagram/ georginagio

He couldn’t get a signature from Cristiano either.

In the same program, Patricia Rodríguez revealed that the 28-year-old model did not help her get Cristiano Ronaldo to sign a shirt for her nephews.

“He did not want to bother Cristiano to sign a shirt for my son because he was on vacation,” he said.

We invite you to follow our Facebook accountso you can stay informed of what is trending on the Internet.

It may interest you:

Anti-corruption Fight Is Stalled, COVID Not Helping

Most countries have made little to no progress in bringing down corruption levels over the past decade, and authorities’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic in many places has weighed on accountability, a closely watched study by an anti-graft organization found Tuesday.

Transparency International’s 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index, which measures the perception of public sector corruption according to experts and business people, found that “increasingly, rights and checks and balances are being undermined not only in countries with systemic corruption and weak institutions, but also among established democracies.”

Among other issues over the past year, it cited the use of Pegasus software, which has been linked to snooping on human rights activists, journalists and politicians across the globe.

The report said the pandemic has “been used in many countries as an excuse to curtail basic freedoms and sidestep important checks and balances.”

In Western Europe, the best-scoring region overall, the pandemic has given countries “an excuse for complacency in anti-corruption efforts as accountability and transparency measures are neglected or even rolled back,” Transparency said. In some Asian countries, it said, COVID-19 “also has been used as an excuse to suppress criticism.” It pointed to increased digital surveillance in some nations and authoritarian approaches in others.

The report ranks countries on a scale from a “highly corrupt” 0 to a “very clean” 100. Denmark, New Zealand and Finland tied for first place with 88 points each; the first two were unchanged, while Finland gained three points. Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Germany completed the top 10. The U.K. was 11th with 78.

The United States, which slipped over recent years to hit 67 points in 2020, held that score this time but slipped a couple of places to 27th. Transparency said it dropped out of the top 25 for the first time “as it faces continuous attacks on free and fair elections and an opaque campaign finance system.”

Canada, which slid three points to 74 and two places to 13th, “is seeing increased risks of bribery and corruption in business,” the group said. It added that the publication of the Pandora Papers showed Canada as “a hub for illicit financial flows, fueling transnational corruption across the region and the world.”

The index rates 180 countries and territories. South Sudan was bottom with 11 points; Somalia, with which it shared last place in 2020, tied this time with Syria for second-to-last with 13. Venezuela followed with 14 — then Yemen, North Korea and Afghanistan tied with 16 apiece.

Transparency said the control of corruption has stagnated or worsened in 86% of the countries it surveyed in the last 10 years. In that time, 23 countries — including the U.S., Canada, Hungary and Poland — have declined significantly in its index, while 25 have improved significantly. They include Estonia, the Seychelles and Armenia.

Compiled since 1995, the index is calculated using 13 different data sources that provide perceptions of public sector corruption from business people and country experts. Sources include the World Bank, the World Economic Forum and private risk and consulting companies.