Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta convicted. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta convicted. Mostrar todas las entradas

A pro-democracy Hong Kong radio DJ was convicted of seditious speech on Wednesday under a British colonial-era law that authorities have embraced as China flattens dissent in the business hub.

Tam Tak-chi, 49, is among a growing number of activists charged with sedition, a previously little-used law that prosecutors have dusted off in the wake of massive and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests in 2019.

Tam’s trial was the first since Hong Kong’s 1997 handover in which a sedition defendant fought his case by pleading not guilty and went through a full trial.

Two previous recent prosecutions were wrapped up after guilty pleas.

As a result, Tam’s conviction is a legal watershed because it sets precedents for a host of upcoming sedition prosecutions as China remolds Hong Kong in its own authoritarian image.

Better known by his moniker “Fast Beat,” Tak hosted a popular online talk show that backed democracy and was highly critical of the government, often using colorful language.

He was a regular presence at protests and often set up street booths to deliver political speeches.

Prosecutors focused on the street booths, with Tam convicted on seven counts of “uttering seditious words” as well as other charges such as disorderly conduct and disobeying a police officer.

Authorities said Tam incited hatred against the authorities by chanting the popular protest slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times” 171 times, cursing the police force some 120 times, and repeatedly shouting “Down with the Communist Party.”

“The attack on the Communist Party is only part of the seditious words uttered by the accused,” district judge Stanley Chan said in his verdict.

“Looking at what he (Tam) said, it’s far beyond criticizing and theorizing,” he added.

Sedition is separate from the sweeping national security law that Beijing imposed on Hong Kong in 2020.

But the courts treat it with the same severity and there are plans to make sedition one of a number of new national security crimes later this year, meaning it will soon carry a much longer jail term.

Tam was arrested in September 2020 and denied bail, as happens in most national security cases.

His trial began in July 2021 but was delayed for a landmark High Court ruling in which judges declared the popular protest slogan “Liberate Hong Kong” was secessionist and therefore illegal under the new security law.

That ruling legally crystallized the reality that certain views and slogans are now forbidden in Hong Kong under the security law.

In Hong Kong, sedition is broadly defined as any words that generate “hatred, contempt or disaffection” towards the government or “encourage disaffection” among residents.

It carries up to two years in jail for a first offense.

First penned by colonial ruler Britain in 1938, it was long criticized as an anti-free speech law, including by many of the pro-Beijing local newspapers now praising its use.

By the time of the 1997 handover, it had not been used for decades but remained on the books.

On the same day Tam was convicted, police charged two men aged 17 and 19 with “uttering seditious words” in a separate case concerning a campus protest in 2020.

In recent months, sedition charges have been brought against pro-democracy unionists who produced euphemistic children’s books about a village of sheep defending itself from wolves; journalists from now-shuttered pro-democracy news outlets; and a former pop star turned democracy activist.

In January, a man was jailed for eight months and a woman 13-and-a-half months after pleading guilty in two separate cases over seditious leaflets.

An Alabama man affiliated with the far-right Oath Keepers militia group pleaded guilty Wednesday to seditious conspiracy for his actions leading up and through the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, making him the first person involved in the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol to be convicted of the rarely used charge.

The sentencing guideline range for Joshua A. James, who also pleaded guilty to a charge of obstruction of an official proceeding, was estimated to be from 7¼ to nine years in prison.

The 34-year-old from Arab, Alabama, acknowledged getting into a physical altercation with a police officer while inside the Capitol and participating in a plan to use force to hinder or delay the transfer of presidential power. James also agreed to cooperate with authorities investigating the riot, including testifying before a grand jury.

Authorities say James and others affiliated with the group rode golf carts to the Capitol, moved through the crowd in a military-style “stack” formation and went into the building.

James was accused of pushing past officers who tried to stop rioters from moving toward the Rotunda, joining others who confronted officers, and profanely proclaiming the building was his. A week before the riot, James said in an encrypted chat that he believed teams within the militia group were adequately armed, prosecutors said in court records.

While four other people connected with the Oath Keepers have pleaded guilty to obstruction of Congress and a lesser conspiracy charge, James is the first among the 11 people associated with the group to plead guilty to a seditious conspiracy charge.

The seditious conspiracy prosecution is the boldest publicly known attempt so far by the government to prosecute those who attacked the U.S. Capitol. The group’s founder, Stewart Rhodes, and others have pleaded not guilty to seditious conspiracy and other charges. A seditious conspiracy conviction carries a maximum penalty of 20 years, compared with five years on the lesser conspiracy charge facing other group members.

Those charged with seditious conspiracy are accused of working together to use force to stop the peaceful transfer of presidential power. Authorities say participants discussed their plans in encrypted chats, traveled to the nation’s capital from across the country, organized into teams, used military tactics, stashed weapons in case they felt they were needed, and communicated with each other during the riot.

Prosecutors say the group set up a “quick reaction force,” or QRF, that kept guns at a hotel in nearby Arlington, Virginia, and were prepared to bring the weapons into Washington if Rhodes or associates believed the need arose. Days before the attack, one defendant suggested getting a boat to ferry weapons across the Potomac River. In the end, the QRF teams didn’t bring guns into Washington.

At the Capitol, Oath Keepers marched in two teams in stack formation, with team members advancing forward with one hand on the shoulder of the person in front of them.

More than 750 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the riot. Over 220 riot defendants have pleaded guilty, more than 100 have been sentenced, and at least 90 others have trial dates.

The longest prison sentence handed down so far to a Jan. 6 rioter was given to Robert Palmer of Largo, Florida.

Palmer, who was sentenced to 5½ years in prison, acknowledged hurling a wooden plank at officers protecting a Capitol entrance, spraying a fire extinguisher, and then throwing it when it was done.

The attack resulted in the deaths of five people, including a police officer. More than 100 officers were injured. Rioters caused over $1 million in damage.

Three former Minneapolis police officers have been convicted of violating George Floyd’s civil rights.

Tou Thao, J. Alexander Kueng and Thomas Lane were charged with depriving Floyd of his right to medical care when Officer Derek Chauvin pressed his knee into Floyd’s neck for 9½ minutes as the 46-year-old Black man was handcuffed and face down on the street on May 25, 2020.

Thao and Lane were also charged with failing to intervene to stop Chauvin.

The videotaped killing sparked protests in Minneapolis that spread around the globe as part of reckoning over racial injustice. Chauvin was convicted of murder last year in state court and pleaded guilty in December in the federal case.

Kueng knelt on Floyd’s back, Lane held his legs and Thao kept bystanders back.

Kueng and Lane both said they deferred to Chauvin as the senior officer at the scene. Thao testified that he relied on the other officers to care for Floyd’s medical needs as his attention was elsewhere.

Conviction of a federal civil rights violation that results in death is punishable by life in prison or even death, but such sentences are extremely rare.

During the monthlong trial, prosecutors sought to show that the officers violated their training, including when they failed to move Floyd or give him CPR. Prosecutors argued that Floyd’s condition was so serious that even bystanders without basic medical training could see he needed help.

Lane, Kueng and Thao also face a separate trial in June on state charges alleging that they aided and abetted murder and manslaughter.

Diego Cadavid, the father of the girl Sofía Cadavid, who was murdered on December 17, 2020 in Rionegro, in Eastern Antioquia, was sentenced to 35 years in prison.

A judge issued the conviction for aggravated homicide, in a case that shocked the country, as the 18-month-old girl died violently.

(You may be interested in: Changes in peak and Medellin plate; it would end up being every other day)

The main suspect, after the investigations, was the father, and that is why a process was started. On December 18, one day after the crime and when Cadavid was captured, Francisco Barbosa himself, Attorney General of the Nation, stated that he would be charged with the crime of aggravated femicide.

“We are going to charge him with the crime of aggravated femicide before a judge of guarantees. We are not going to allow acts of impunity in this country,” were Barbosa’s words at the time.

(You can also read: They seize a truck with 100 kilos of coca hydrochloride in Medellín)

Velathon

The Rio Negro children joined the wake in memory of Sofía Cadavid.

Photo:

Courtesy Mayor of Rionegro

As this newspaper had already reported, Diego Armando Cadavid had taken her from his home in Rionegro (Eastern Antioquia) at 12 noon and had arranged to return her at six in the afternoon, as confirmed by the authorities.

Upon reporting her as missing, the Army, Firefighters, Police, residents of the sector and officials from the Mayor’s Office of Rionegro undertook the search for the 18-month-old girl.

“Around 2:24 in the morning, the girl Sofía was found lifeless, with signs of violence and wounded with a sharp weapon. Given this, and after the evidence collected by the judicial authorities, an arrest warrant was issued against the victim’s father and -as I mentioned- that arrest warrant has been confirmed and the alleged aggressor of the girl Sofía has been captured. “, detailed at that time Rodrigo Hernández Alzate, mayor of Rionegro.

(We suggest you read: Daniel Quintero will denounce threats and persecution against him before the IACHR)

On the judge’s ruling, the local president celebrated that justice has been done.

“I am pleased that Justice condemns the murderer of the girl Sofía Cadavid for aggravated homicide, in December 2020, in a fact that tore us as rionegreros and society. In Rionegro all life is sacred and even more so those of our children, to whom we should only give love, example and protection,” he said.

MEDELLIN

More news from Colombia

-Woman murdered her husband with a kitchen knife

-They denounce that students in Sincelejo are receiving classes on the ground

-86-year-old grandmother was captured for stealing three pounds of rice

Although he has not served his 24-year prison sentence for the murder of Luis Carlos Galan Sarmiento, in 1989, former senator Alberto Santofimio Botero He reappeared in a public act in which he touched on current political issues such as the consultations of the pre-candidates for the Presidency of the Republic.

(You may be interested in: Piedad Córdoba’s trips for which the Supreme Court is investigating)

About a thousand people attended the event at the Convention Center of the Government of Tolima, including former mayors, former governors and political leaders of Tolima, who accompanied him at the launch of his book ‘Fragmented Memories’.

Santofimio was sentenced on October 11, 2007 by the Supreme Court of Justice as co-author responsible for the death of the liberal caudillo Luis Carlos Galánwho was emerging as the winner of the 1990 presidential election.

At that time, the Court overturned the acquittal for doubt that the Superior Court of Cundinamarca issued in favor of Santofimio and considered that the politician of Tolimense origin did instigate the capo Pablo Escobar to order the murder of Galán, on August 17, 1989 in the main square of Soacha, Bogotá, where he had arrived to preside over a political rally.

The testimony of Jhon Jairo Velásquez, alias Popeye, who pointed out that Santofimio was the one who “prompted” Pablo Escobar to order Galán’s crime, was key in the conviction of the politician.

During the presentation of his book, Santofimio referred to the electoral contest that the country is experiencing and affirmed that in the consultations there are candidates who applied for themselves to reach the Presidency of the Republic.

“There is no will of the parties, there are no channels of democratic participation, there are no conventions, the people are absent from all that,” said the former senator, adding that “they self-proclaimed candidates and made the State spend a million in consultations that confuse the voter.

More content from Colombia:

Puppy spent three days waiting outside the hospital for his sick owner

They discover in Cali a false priest who asked for money in exchange for blessings

The three men convicted of murder in Ahmaud Arbery’s fatal shooting were found guilty of federal hate crimes Tuesday for violating Arbery’s civil rights and targeting him because he was Black.

The jury reached its decision after several hours of deliberation on the charges against father and son Greg and Travis McMichael and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan.

During the trial, prosecutors showed roughly two dozen text messages and social media posts in which Travis McMichael and Bryan used racist slurs and made derogatory comments about Black people. The FBI wasn’t able to access Greg McMichael’s phone because it was encrypted.

The McMichaels grabbed guns and jumped in a pickup truck to pursue Arbery after seeing him running in their neighborhood outside the Georgia port city of Brunswick in February 2020. Bryan joined the pursuit in his own pickup and recorded cellphone video of Travis McMichael fatally shooting Arbery. The killing became part of a larger national reckoning on racial injustice after the graphic video leaked online two months later.

The McMichaels and Bryan pleaded not guilty to the hate crime charges. Defense attorneys contended the three didn’t chase and kill Arbery because of his race but acted on the earnest, though erroneous, suspicion that Arbery had committed crimes in their neighborhood.

The panel of eight white people, three Black people and one Hispanic person received the case Monday following a weeklong trial in U.S. District Court in the port city of Brunswick. The jurors adjourned for the night after about three hours of deliberations, and resumed deliberations at 9 a.m. Tuesday morning.

The trial closed Monday with prosecutors saying 25-year-old Arbery’s slaying on a residential street was motivated by “pent-up racial anger,” revealed by the defendants’ electronic messages as well as by witnesses who testified to hearing them make racist tirades and insults.

“All three defendants told you loud and clear, in their own words, how they feel about African Americans,” prosecutor Tara Lyons told the jury Monday.

Defense attorneys insisted that past racist statements by their clients offered no proof they violated Arbery’s civil rights and targeted him because he’s Black. They urged the jury to set aside their emotions.

“It’s natural for you to want retribution or revenge,” said Pete Theodocion, representing William “Roddie” Bryan. “But we have to elevate ourselves … even if it’s the tough thing.”

The basic facts aren’t disputed. The slaying of Arbery nearly two years ago, on Feb. 23, 2020, was captured in a graphic cellphone video that sparked widespread outrage. Father and son Greg and Travis McMichael armed themselves after spotting Arbery running past their home and chased him in a pickup truck. Bryan joined his neighbors in his own truck and recorded the video of Travis McMichael firing at point-blank range.

Police found Arbery had no weapon and no stolen items. Prosecutors said he was merely out jogging.

Travis McMichael’s attorney, Amy Lee Copeland, told the jury that prosecutors presented no evidence that he “ever spoke to anyone about Mr. Arbery’s death in racial terms.” She said her client opened fire in self-defense after Arbery tried to take away his shotgun.

Greg McMichael’s attorney, A.J. Balbo, argued that his client initiated the chase not because Arbery was a Black man, but because he was “THE man” the McMichaels had seen in security camera videos taken from a nearby house under construction.

The McMichaels and Bryan, convicted of murder last fall in a Georgia state court, pleaded not guilty to the federal charges.

FBI agents uncovered roughly two dozen racist text messages and social media posts from the McMichaels and Bryan in the years and months preceding the shooting.

For instance, in 2018, Travis McMichael commented on a Facebook video of a Black man playing a prank on a white person: “I’d kill that f—-ing n—-r.”

Some witnesses testified they heard the McMichaels’ racist statements firsthand. A woman who served under Travis McMichael in the U.S. Coast Guard a decade ago said he called her “n——r lover,” after learning she’d dated a Black man. Another woman testified Greg McMichael had ranted angrily in 2015 when she remarked on the death of civil rights activist Julian Bond, saying, “All those Blacks are nothing but trouble.”

The Superior Court of Cartagena sentenced the active councilor to 48 months in prison of the capital of Bolívar César Pión, and former city councilor Américo Mendoza for malfeasance by action.

According to the high court, Pión and Mendoza, as president and vice president of the council, would have issued 18 resolutions in 2011 that favored the readjustment of fees in several of their colleagues and former colleagues for a value that exceeds $7,609 million pesoswhile the city is condemned to poverty by its rulers.

(Also: 38 priests in Villavicencio would be related in cases of pederasty)

“We public men have to be respectful of the law and comply with judicial rulings,” said César Pión in a video that he made public on his social networks.

He orders disqualification from exercising public functions for a term of 80 months and requests that arrest warrants be issued against César Augusto Pión González and Américo Elías Mendoza Quesep and the serving of a sentence of 48 months in prison under the house modality. for jail.

(Also: House by jail for president of the Council of Cartagena)

“We don’t hide, we show our faces and we respect the law, and if we have to pay for mistakes… well, we have to pay for mistakes,” added Pión.

This is the first conviction of both public figures, who may resort to appeals.

The councilwoman who traveled in a car
where they hid a kilo of cocaine

On January 21, a judge ordered house arrest for the president of the Cartagena Council, Gloria Estrada, captured when she was found in a van in which a kilo of cocaine, a firearm and 7,950,000 pesos were being transported.

The measure will be maintained while the trial for the crimes of manufacture and possession of narcotics is carried out. According to the judge, the house arrest is given because Estrada has “the right to the presumption of his innocence, while a trial proves otherwise, especially the condition of chance mentioned by his defenders.”

(Also: Herman Naranjo, kidnapped community leader in Arauca, is assassinated)

The president of the Cartagena Council, who belongs to the Liberal Party, was captured at a police checkpoint in the Manga neighborhood, when she was on her way home for lunch.

According to the investigations, the lobbyist would be at the service of criminal gangs, but she has said that the vehicle is not hers and “that she did not know that substance was going there. How could I see that this substance was under the driver’s seat?

Cartagena

More news in Colombia

La Guajira and Cesar are incommunicado due to an indefinite civic strike

Police Colonel is denounced for sexual abuse in Santa Marta and Putumayo

top