Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Privacy. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Privacy. Mostrar todas las entradas

A young woman from Cartagena, and her sentimental partner, demand their rights to have sex in the privacy of their apartment and ensure that the neighbors and administration of the building where they live persecute them for express your sexual passion on the privacy of your home.

This mess of horizontal property is presented in the apartment 704 of the Gemini buildingfrom the exclusive sector of sky seain Cartagena de Indias.

(Also: ‘Caciques’ and old political practices in search of Chamber for Bolívar)

In dialogue with this newspaper, the young woman, who asks to reserve her name, assured that last Saturday she came to live with her sentimental partner in the Gemini building, due to the beautiful view that offers the Caribbean Sea and the swamp of the virgin.

public ridicule

What the administration did with this public ridicule without a previous legal process of co-ownership, that violates due process and violation of human dignity and the good name of the person

“Last Tuesday night, after 8 pm, in the privacy of our home, we made love to my partner, as we always have. But suddenly the security guard calls us to tell us that a neighbor is upset because hear screams and moans”, says the young woman, who put the case in the hands of her lawyer.

But the claims of this young woman go further and assures that from the administration of the building they have pointed her out to others residents of the Gemini building.

“First they shouldn’t have called to interrupt us. But also, the next day the administrator came up, with several employees, which is demeaning, to scold me because according to her I couldn’t be intimate with my boyfriend in my room and told me that I ‘I have to control‘”, adds the young woman.

They can’t make me feel guilty for enjoying my sexuality“, adds the young woman.

According to the complainant, her neighbors have been recording audios with the sexual expressions of the couple.

“The most delicate thing is that there is a neighbor who records our intimacy, she is spying on us and share the audios by WhatsApp“, he maintains.

(Also: Teachers from Tolima lifted the strike and returned to classes)

In dialogue with this newspaper, Viviana Navarro, administrator of the building, assures that the only thing that is required of the young couple is that they measure their sexual expressions so as not to interrupt the peace and rest of the families, with children, of the 105 apartments of the property. private.

“This is an exclusive set and we have never experienced scandals of this nature. And I have the duty to mediate between the residents, and if this occurs in the first week of coexistence of these people, what can we expect from the entire year of contract that this couple signed? “said Navarro.

violation of human dignity
and the good name of the person

The most delicate thing is that there is a neighbor who records our intimacy, she is spying on us and they share the audios on WhatsApp

According to the young today he is the target of stares, ridicule and malicious comments from neighbors and building officialsreason for which he resorted to a lawyer to defend his rights to the intimacy, honor and good name.

“Today we will file a written complaint with the co-ownership council of the building, because the administrator violated due process: when you live in co-ownership there is a regulation that governs everything that must happen in that co-ownership. The administrator could not have made a reprimand and less in front of witnesses in a matter as sensitive as the sexual intimacy of people, “says Joaquín Torres, the young woman’s lawyer.

(Also: Crisis worsens in El Charco, Nariño: there are three mayors in six months)

According to the lawyer, the regular conduct in this type of situation is to inform the co-ownership council, so that an investigation can be carried out in accordance with the co-ownership statutes and regulations, and a sanction be established.

“What the administration did with this public ridicule without a prior legal process of co-ownership, that violates due process and violation of human dignity and the good name of the person, and it is about fundamental rights,” concludes attorney Torres.

Cartagena

More news in Colombia

Unusual: young man in Chocó used a banana to rob people

Key witness in the Vives case has not received the reward that was promised

Many foreign journalists at the Beijing Winter Olympics tell VOA they have brought “burner” devices, such as phones and laptops completely wiped of personal data, to protect their digital privacy. That’s because China has a long record of surveilling and restricting journalists.

Reporters at the Beijing Olympics will not see much of Beijing at all. Instead, they will be in a closed loop, taking official buses from venue to venue. COVID-19 policies aren’t the only challenge. Another is digital privacy, and journalists are taking extraordinary steps to protect it.

James Griffiths, Asia correspondent for The Globe and Mail, a Canadian newspaper, is currently in the Beijing bubble.

“I set up a burner computer, which is what we’re talking on right now,” he said. “I have a burner phone. I even have a burner iPad with me just to be sure so none of my usual identities are on that. Most of my accounts aren’t logged into while I’m here.”

Griffiths said it is difficult to find any reporter who is not using some type of burner device at the Olympic Games.

It’s a familiar routine for those reporting in China. This week, the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China warned media freedom is declining at “breakneck speed.”

Ahead of the Games, the Committee to Protect Journalists warned reporters to assume everything they do online will be monitored.

So far, those reporting from the Olympics bubble have reported no problems, even if they have limited mobility.

“We can operate as reporters in the closed loop without restrictions,” said Donna Spencer, a sports reporter for The Canadian Press, “but the restrictions inherent in the closed loop prevent us from doing the kind of reporting that someone who is a foreign correspondent here would do a year around.”

It may not be ideal, but Australian journalist Eryk Bagshaw said it is an acceptable tradeoff.

“Essentially you’re submitting yourself to such total surveillance that there’s almost freedom in that,” Bagshaw said. “There’s cameras absolutely everywhere . . . you’re not looking over your shoulder wondering if you’re being tailed because you’re speaking to a Chinese dissident.”

But even this kind of reporting has its challenges.

During his interview with VOA, Bagshaw was interrupted by authorities reminding him of a required COVID-19 test.

“I just need to finish this video interview and then I’ll come down,” he told them. “I’ll be there in 10 minutes, if that’s OK. Thank you very much. Bye … there you go. Right on it.”

Just another challenge of reporting during a pandemic in China.

top